Q 7(c). आधुनिक समाज में विज्ञान और धर्म के बीच सम्बन्ध की प्रकृति क्या है? उपयुक्त उदाहरणों के साथ इसका विश्लेषण कीजिए। (UPSC 2025,10 Marks,150 Words)

Theme: Science and Religion: A Complex Relationship Where in Syllabus: (The subject of the above question is Sociology.)
What is the nature of relationship between science and religion in modern society? Analyze with suitable examples.

प्रस्तावना

The relationship between science and religion is intricate, often marked by both conflict and harmony. Thinkers like Galileo faced opposition from religious authorities, while Einstein saw no conflict, famously stating, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." Surveys reveal that 59% of Americans see them as compatible. Stephen Jay Gould proposed the concept of "non-overlapping magisteria," suggesting science and religion address different realms of human experience, highlighting their potential for coexistence.

Science and Religion: A Complex Relationship

Nature of Relationship between Science and Religion in Modern Society
  ● Complementary Roles:  
    ● Ethical Guidance: Religion often provides ethical frameworks that guide scientific research. For instance, debates on genetic engineering and cloning are influenced by religious perspectives on the sanctity of life.  
    ● Inspiration for Inquiry: Many scientists are motivated by religious beliefs to explore the natural world. Historical figures like Isaac Newton and Gregor Mendel were deeply religious and saw their scientific work as a way to understand divine creation.  
  ● Conflict and Tension:  
    ● Evolution vs. Creationism: The teaching of evolution in schools often clashes with religious beliefs in creationism, leading to legal and educational debates, particularly in countries like the United States.  
    ● Stem Cell Research: Religious objections to embryonic stem cell research have influenced policy and funding decisions, highlighting the tension between scientific progress and religious ethics.  
  ● Dialogue and Integration:  
    ● Interfaith and Scientific Dialogues: Initiatives like the Templeton Foundation promote dialogue between science and religion, funding research that explores their intersections.  
    ● Religious Scientists: Many scientists maintain personal religious beliefs, demonstrating that science and religion can coexist. For example, Francis Collins, a geneticist and former director of the National Institutes of Health, is an outspoken Christian.  
  ● Public Perception and Education:  
    ● Science Education: In some regions, religious beliefs influence the science curriculum, affecting public understanding of scientific concepts like climate change and vaccination.  
    ● Religious Institutions and Science: Some religious institutions actively engage with scientific issues, such as the Vatican Observatory, which conducts astronomical research.  
  ● Cultural and Societal Impact:  
    ● Moral and Social Issues: Religion often shapes societal responses to scientific advancements, such as artificial intelligence and biotechnology, by raising moral and ethical questions.  
    ● Global Health Initiatives: Religious organizations often collaborate with scientific bodies in global health efforts, such as combating HIV/AIDS and promoting vaccination in developing countries.  
  ● Case Studies:  
    ● The Human Genome Project: This scientific endeavor was supported by both secular and religious groups, illustrating a collaborative approach to understanding human biology.  
    ● Climate Change: Religious leaders, including Pope Francis, have called for action on climate change, aligning with scientific consensus and advocating for environmental stewardship.  
 By examining these aspects, it becomes evident that the relationship between science and religion in modern society is multifaceted, involving both collaboration and conflict, shaped by cultural, ethical, and educational factors.

निष्कर्ष

The relationship between science and religion is intricate, often marked by both conflict and harmony. While Galileo and Darwin faced opposition, others like Einstein saw no conflict, stating, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." Today, dialogue continues, with scholars like Ian Barbour advocating for integration. Moving forward, fostering mutual respect and understanding can bridge gaps, allowing both domains to enrich human knowledge and address existential questions collaboratively.